|

Russia? Think Again

By Vitaliy Katsenelson, CFA

As you look at the high-flying Russian stock market, you may feel like you want some of it. But before you dive into Russia consider this: as it is, Russia is a dysfunctional play on high oil prices as well as commodities. It is no less bureaucratic than it was some fifteen years ago.

When you buy a Russian company, with the exception of Gazprom (OGZPY), you run the risk that the Russian government will decide it “wants it,” the same way it “wanted” the Yukos and Sakhalin project from Shell (RDA). Gazprom is a unique case since it seems the whole country’s foreign policy is written in the Gazprom HQ for the benefit of Gazprom and Gazprom alone. When one of the former republics has a dispute with the company about its pipelines or prices, the Russian foreign ministry gets involved. I guess the fact that Gazprom is owned in part by Russian government and remains one of the largest sources of tax revenue in the country certainly makes it Mother-Russia’s business. Gazprom’s play is limited to several factors: it’s a cheap stock (if you trust the reserve numbers); it has been raising natural gas prices in former Soviet republics to market rates; in some cases it is receiving shares of local gas distribution companies in lieu of payment. But in the long-run, I wouldn’t bet on higher production from Gazprom because its capital expenditures are allocated from the Kremlin, whose objectives are more short-term oriented.

 Current Russian prosperity is completely driven by high commodity prices. Take the $60 oil away and what you get is a very backwards economy, poor infrastructure (especially outside Moscow and St. Petersburg – two cities that are swimming in oil money), very high pension liabilities that the country accrued to its seniors during the Soviet days, corrupt local governments and a fairly unstable political system. If you are interested in playing on high commodity prices you might consider (non-Russian) oil services stocks (e.g. GSF, HAL, SLB, BJS etc.) – it’s the same reward or better and lower risk.

Bookmark and Share

Short URL: http://ContrarianEdge.com/?p=169

  • http://marketprognosticator.blogspot.com/ Eric

    I agree with your comments – the entire incident with Yukos was legalized theft. If Russia wanted the assets back they should have gotten it back through estate taxes.

  • Andrey

    Виталька,
    Were you completely stoned when you wrote these lines?
    You know, Yukos stole these assets first in the middle of the nineties with the help of corrupted officials. How else can you name paying $150 millions for assets which actual price is ONE HUNDRED times more. What taxes should it be to return this difference?
    As for Gazprom, this is bullshit. Why do you all like to say that Kremlin uses Gazprom as an instrument to put pressure upon our neighbors. The thing is that Gazprom is very important for the economy, it creates a lot of jobs, taxes. Why should it sell gas to the Ukraine five times cheaper than to Germany. It harms our economy, which is still very weak. The US for example doesn’t sell F-18 fighters to the beloved Israel for $10 million, if they cost $50 million. Why should we? Besides, Microsoft’s Windows is installed in nearly every computer in the world, but nobody says it’s a pressure upon other countries.
    And I can judge your recommendation to buy Halliburton shares instead of Gazprom’s as the top of cynicism. At least we did not unleash war because of Gazprom’s interests as you did in Iraq in Halliburton’s favor. You wasted hundreds of billion dollars, hundred thousand Iraqi civilians and more than 3000 lives of your own soldiers and for what? To make George and Dick happy? Come on, give me a break.

  • Andrey

    Vital’ka,
    Were you completely stoned when you wrote these lines?
    You know, Yukos stole these assets first in the middle of the nineties with the help of corrupted officials. How else can you name paying $150 millions for assets which actual price is ONE HUNDRED times more. What taxes should it be to return this difference?
    As for Gazprom, this is bullshit. Why do you all like to say that Kremlin uses Gazprom as an instrument to put pressure upon our neighbors. The thing is that Gazprom is very important for the economy, it creates a lot of jobs, taxes. Why should it sell gas to the Ukraine five times cheaper than to Germany. It harms our economy, which is still very weak. The US for example doesn’t sell F-18 fighters to the beloved Israel for $10 million, if they cost $50 million. Why should we? Besides, Microsoft’s Windows is installed in nearly every computer in the world, but nobody says it’s a pressure upon other countries.
    And I can judge your recommendation to buy Halliburton shares instead of Gazprom’s as the top of cynicism. At least we did not unleash war because of Gazprom’s interests as you did in Iraq in Halliburton’s favor. You wasted hundreds of billion dollars, hundred thousand Iraqi civilians and more than 3000 lives of your own soldiers and for what? To make George and Dick happy? Come on, give me a break.

Recently Commented

  • Anonymous: Great story and I admire your work. Did you marry a Russian girl? Being married to a Russian girl and...
  • Christian Rivera: Also can Walmart grow eps 15%/yr like they did from 1996 to 2006?
  • Christian Rivera: Vitaliyk, do you think Walmart will increase margins more than 50% (3.5% to 5.3%) in the next...
  • McCoy Penninger: I really enjoyed reading this.  Dead on.
  • I Need Money: So I guess is we hear Hoenig say that “the Fed should stick to its mission as lender of last...