<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caterpillar&#8217;s Earnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ContrarianEdge.com/2009/07/21/caterpillars-earnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2009/07/21/caterpillars-earnings/</link>
	<description>Vitaliy Katsenelson blog on the economy, stock market, and stocks.  Applying Active Value Investing approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 08:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Ryan</title>
		<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2009/07/21/caterpillars-earnings/comment-page-1/#comment-190501</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContrarianEdge.com/?p=1149#comment-190501</guid>
		<description>From a turnaround perspective, another bright spot can be found in Caterpillar&#039;s cash-flow statement. The first quarter of this year saw an increase in both cash flow from operations and free cash flow from the first quarter of &#039;08. That&#039;s the same quarter that saw Caterpillar post a loss.

However, that point largely pertains to dividend sustainability; 2Q&#039;s cash flow report may tell a different story. I think you&#039;re right about Caterpillar being a buy only when its earnings have been wrecked. That rule usually holds for cyclical stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a turnaround perspective, another bright spot can be found in Caterpillar&#8217;s cash-flow statement. The first quarter of this year saw an increase in both cash flow from operations and free cash flow from the first quarter of &#8217;08. That&#8217;s the same quarter that saw Caterpillar post a loss.</p>
<p>However, that point largely pertains to dividend sustainability; 2Q&#8217;s cash flow report may tell a different story. I think you&#8217;re right about Caterpillar being a buy only when its earnings have been wrecked. That rule usually holds for cyclical stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

