Archive for August, 2007

Navigating In “Interesting Times”

The Federal Reserve’s latest move was to encourage lending, not to stimulate borrowing. (There are plenty of wannabe borrowers sitting on the sidelines, waiting their turn.) The Chinese curse comes to mind here – may you live in an interesting time. This is an interesting market. This market will wash out a lot of investors who jumped into it for the wrong reason – it was going up and they felt they had to be there.NavigatingThe fixed income market is going through the readjustment of risk. The spreads between risky and not risky assets have gotten to absurd levels. I wrote about it before,

Russian companies were borrowing money at a few percentage points (or less) above T-Bills. How rational is that? Not very! Lenders were not properly compensated for taking risk (providing risky loans). The defaults in the subprime space reminded lenders what risk looks like (something they’ve forgotten in the latest frenzy).However, as it usually happens the risk re-adjustment will probably go from one extreme to another, there is a good chance that risk premium will overshoot its normal level and go to a higher extreme. We are not there, yet. For instance high yield (junk) bonds usually have a yield 5% above risk free bonds (T-bills), several months ago, that spread got as low at 1%. Right now spreads are approaching 5%, but they are less likely to stop there and go higher (well, this is how the average is created). This will (and already has) cause a dry up in private equity deals, breaking one leg under the market.

Portfolio managers are in a pickle, if they own corporate bonds – risk premium and thus borrowing rates are likely to rise. So it’s not a great place to be (maybe the very short end of that spectrum is safe). The Fed, with yesterday’s move, signaled that the next move in interest rates is likely to be down, not up. Action in T-bills shows that this is where the market finds safety. However, returns from T-bills are miniscule and will barely compensate investors for (understated) inflation.

Of course, depending on one’s investment horizon, the right stocks are still a place to be. What are the right stocks? The ones that have little exposure to consumer discretionary spending, whose business is not tied to heavy dependence on consumer financing (i.e. home equity loans), financials should be owned with caution – despite the Fed’s latest action it may get a lot worse before it gets better. You want to look at companies that don’t heavily rely on outside financing, in other words have strong balance sheets and don’t have large amounts of debt maturing in the near future. All this being said, a company in trouble is often a good investment at the right price.

Markets painted all financials with the same gloomy brush, all financials are not created equal. Lincoln Financial and US Bancorp (USB) for example have little exposure to sub-prime, but they are still down significantly with the rest of the pack. When I talked to my business partner this morning he said something that really struck me as the right attitude for this market (or actually any market). “Next time you make a decision ask yourself – what would Warren Buffett do?” He’d be patient and long-term oriented. He’d look at chaos and fear as opportunity. And no, the world is not coming to an end; we survived many wars, credit crunches, terrorist attacks and even Paris Hilton going to jail. We’ll be OK this time too. 


Vitaliy Katsenelson,CFA and a vice president/portfolio manager with Denver-based Investment Management Associates. His book, Active Value Investing, will be published by John Wiley & Sons in September 2007. More articles at ContrarianEdge.com  

Add comment August 20th, 2007

Goodbye Moto, Hello Nokia!

By Vitaliy Katsenelson, CFA

It seems that Motorola (MOT) comes out with a good handset that everybody wants every five years or so. Considering that, we have a couple more years to go until the company will have another blockbuster handset again.  This failure by Motorola is a big positive for Nokia (NOK) on many fronts.  

Buy Moto, Hello NokiaOr to piggyback on a well-known Motorola advertising tagline: Goodbye, Moto — and hello, Nokia.

First, it shows that Nokia’s management can execute despite not having the “hottest” phone on the market (i.e. Motorola’s Razr). Also, it will be further taking market share from Motorola; I estimate its margins will further improve, driving its earnings north of $2 a share over the next couple of years. After seeing Nokia’s second-quarter results, that estimate could come sooner rather than later.

The best part is Nokia doesn’t have to do anything heroic to achieve that goal. Operational leverage (higher volumes spread over fixed costs) and a shift to a higher margin (more feature-rich phones) will do the work. This was the driver of the company’s truly incredible operating performance in the second quarter.

 The second quarter was simply spectacular: operating profit in every segment with the exception of its networks division grew in the high double digits, and sales climbed a whopping 28%.  

 At the current share price, you are not really paying for the network segment, in fact, since it loses money it detracts from the company’s valuation. But at some point its profitability will turn positive and the division will become a contributor to Nokia’s bottom line.

Samsung is a conglomerate, and although it’s a good one, it still lacks Nokia’s focus. Despite being located in a lower labor-cost part of the world, South Korea-based Samsung doesn’t have a cost advantage against Nokia, as Finland-based Nokia manufactures its phones all over the world, including in China. Nokia has proved to be the Dell of cell phones from a cost-structure and manufacturing-efficiency perspective and Apple-like when it comes to innovation — it comes out with several dozen phones year after year.

There is still upside in Nokia’s global market share, because Nokia has just a small market share in the U.S., accounting for only 4% of its volume. It is only a matter of time before Nokia starts taking market share in the U.S.; it has already started to design U.S.-centric phones. As Nokia regains market share in the U.S., this will drive its global market share. Despite not having the phones in the U.S. that consumers seemed to want, Nokia still has an excellent brand reputation in the U.S., so it just needs to fix relationships with U.S. carriers (AT&T (T) , Verizon (VZ) and T-Mobile) and start selling phones that the rest of the world is so crazy about.

Disclosure: I have a position in Nokia

1 comment August 9th, 2007



Categories