<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Let Bull Market Convince You That You Are Smart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/</link>
	<description>Vitaliy Katsenelson blog on the economy, stock market, and stocks.  Applying Active Value Investing approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidDT</title>
		<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>Vitaly,
market is deceitful just like Devil who&#039;s greatest trick was to convince everyone the Devil does not exist, market&#039;s greatest trick is convince everyone that &quot;one&quot; is smarter than a market. Right before the very end of 1999 the doorman of my New York&#039;s building stopped me and shared his excitement of how he &quot;just made a killing on  the stock market - easy&quot;. That is really great when everyone is making money, that is strange that it is easy, so I went short on Software.com and KANA and after quite a bumpy ride up for a while rode those stocks all the way down to under a $1 ( from well above $1000 I think). Market is a hard work, the moment one disrespect Mr. Market - is the beginning of the end</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vitaly,<br />
market is deceitful just like Devil who&#8217;s greatest trick was to convince everyone the Devil does not exist, market&#8217;s greatest trick is convince everyone that &#8220;one&#8221; is smarter than a market. Right before the very end of 1999 the doorman of my New York&#8217;s building stopped me and shared his excitement of how he &#8220;just made a killing on  the stock market &#8211; easy&#8221;. That is really great when everyone is making money, that is strange that it is easy, so I went short on Software.com and KANA and after quite a bumpy ride up for a while rode those stocks all the way down to under a $1 ( from well above $1000 I think). Market is a hard work, the moment one disrespect Mr. Market &#8211; is the beginning of the end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitaliy</title>
		<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitaliy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Hank,
Thank you for a very thoughtful response.  I strongly disagree with your â€œcyclicalâ€ comment, I disagree so much that I am finishing a book on the subject (see book tab on the blog).  

Regarding P/Es.  If interest rates stay at these low levels than it will be an indication that economy is slipping into a recession.   If economy is going to continue keep humming along than interest rates will likely rise.  Neither scenario is good for P/Es.  

David,

I agree, take a look a look at the article I wrote on the subject â€œIt Is Not the Cards You are Dealt; But is How You Play Themâ€ on December 2nd, 2006.

Best,
Vitaliy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank,<br />
Thank you for a very thoughtful response.  I strongly disagree with your â€œcyclicalâ€ comment, I disagree so much that I am finishing a book on the subject (see book tab on the blog).  </p>
<p>Regarding P/Es.  If interest rates stay at these low levels than it will be an indication that economy is slipping into a recession.   If economy is going to continue keep humming along than interest rates will likely rise.  Neither scenario is good for P/Es.  </p>
<p>David,</p>
<p>I agree, take a look a look at the article I wrote on the subject â€œIt Is Not the Cards You are Dealt; But is How You Play Themâ€ on December 2nd, 2006.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Vitaliy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>The decision to staying true to ones &quot;discipline&quot; is key to long term investment success. I often refer to the comparison of discipline versus conviction. I can&#039;t tell you how many investors in 1999 had a &quot;conviction&quot; that tech stocks were going to grow to the sky. Many investors threw &quot;discipline&quot; out the window and paid dearly for the mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision to staying true to ones &#8220;discipline&#8221; is key to long term investment success. I often refer to the comparison of discipline versus conviction. I can&#8217;t tell you how many investors in 1999 had a &#8220;conviction&#8221; that tech stocks were going to grow to the sky. Many investors threw &#8220;discipline&#8221; out the window and paid dearly for the mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Riehl</title>
		<link>http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Riehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ContrarianEdge.com/2007/02/24/dont-let-bull-market-convince-you-that-you-are-smart/#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>I read your article in Saturday&#039;s RMN Business Section. And I must admit, I too had those &quot;feel stupid&quot; moments myself. Too many of them.

But take it from a guy who managed very large corporate pension funds of Fortune 500 companies, we are in more than just a &quot;cyclical&quot; bull market as you suggest. A lot of smart guys I know think that this market is a continuation of &quot;secular&quot; bull market that began in the mid-1970s or early-1980. So if you feel bad about your BDX hitting the high-70s after you sold it in the low-70s, then you are going to feel a lot worse when it breaks 100.

As you know, BDX enjoys positive price momentum with a rising price above a rising 50-day moving average which, in turn, sits above a rising 200-day moving average. But that&#039;s only a small part of it. The relative yield on the 10- year Treasury note comapred to the earnings yield on the foreward projected earnings of the S&amp;P 500 suggests stocks are undervalued by some 25% compared to bonds--severe undervaluation last seen over 25 years ago. This model (which accurately suggested 65% overvaluation in 1999-2000) may not tell you &quot;when,&quot; but it accurately tells you for &quot;how much&quot; you are playing the game. That translates into a DJIA solidly north of 15000. For investors, the upside clearly outweighs the downside. 

So may I suggest that you put those backward-looking annual reports down. Althoug interesting to read, that information has been dicsounted by a foreward looking market some 6-9 months prior to their publication dates. So, the next time that BDX kisses its 50-day moving average (and it will), buy it!
  
 
And by the way, the &quot;E&quot; in P/E is worth a lot more under conditions of low inflation expectations versus periods of high inflation expectations. A historical average (or mean) is an apples-to oranges-comparison that includes both periods of low AND high inflation. You can&#039;t have both at the same time. Per the historically low yield (some 70% determined by inflation expectations) on the 10-year Treasury, we are in a low inflationary environment. The only comparable P/E was accompanied by a low inflationary environment. Bottom line: we have room for some P/E expansion per the low 4.7% yield on the 10-year T.

And just because earnings growth may be slowing, it doesn&#039;t mean that those still rising earnings are worth less. Historically, they can be worth more if accompanied by lower inflation. All things equal, a 5% earnings gain gets you 5% more P. And if those earnings are worth (valued) more because of lower inflation, you can get an even higher P, say 10 or 15% higher.

2/24/2007 10:17:00 AM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your article in Saturday&#8217;s RMN Business Section. And I must admit, I too had those &#8220;feel stupid&#8221; moments myself. Too many of them.</p>
<p>But take it from a guy who managed very large corporate pension funds of Fortune 500 companies, we are in more than just a &#8220;cyclical&#8221; bull market as you suggest. A lot of smart guys I know think that this market is a continuation of &#8220;secular&#8221; bull market that began in the mid-1970s or early-1980. So if you feel bad about your BDX hitting the high-70s after you sold it in the low-70s, then you are going to feel a lot worse when it breaks 100.</p>
<p>As you know, BDX enjoys positive price momentum with a rising price above a rising 50-day moving average which, in turn, sits above a rising 200-day moving average. But that&#8217;s only a small part of it. The relative yield on the 10- year Treasury note comapred to the earnings yield on the foreward projected earnings of the S&amp;P 500 suggests stocks are undervalued by some 25% compared to bonds&#8211;severe undervaluation last seen over 25 years ago. This model (which accurately suggested 65% overvaluation in 1999-2000) may not tell you &#8220;when,&#8221; but it accurately tells you for &#8220;how much&#8221; you are playing the game. That translates into a DJIA solidly north of 15000. For investors, the upside clearly outweighs the downside. </p>
<p>So may I suggest that you put those backward-looking annual reports down. Althoug interesting to read, that information has been dicsounted by a foreward looking market some 6-9 months prior to their publication dates. So, the next time that BDX kisses its 50-day moving average (and it will), buy it!</p>
<p>And by the way, the &#8220;E&#8221; in P/E is worth a lot more under conditions of low inflation expectations versus periods of high inflation expectations. A historical average (or mean) is an apples-to oranges-comparison that includes both periods of low AND high inflation. You can&#8217;t have both at the same time. Per the historically low yield (some 70% determined by inflation expectations) on the 10-year Treasury, we are in a low inflationary environment. The only comparable P/E was accompanied by a low inflationary environment. Bottom line: we have room for some P/E expansion per the low 4.7% yield on the 10-year T.</p>
<p>And just because earnings growth may be slowing, it doesn&#8217;t mean that those still rising earnings are worth less. Historically, they can be worth more if accompanied by lower inflation. All things equal, a 5% earnings gain gets you 5% more P. And if those earnings are worth (valued) more because of lower inflation, you can get an even higher P, say 10 or 15% higher.</p>
<p>2/24/2007 10:17:00 AM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

